Critical Review of National Flood Policy Outcomes

Stanley Michelle (), Hotard Abbey, Pilgreen Daniel and Meyer Michelle
Additional contact information
Stanley Michelle: Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Hotard Abbey: Department of Marine and Coastal Environmental Science, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA
Pilgreen Daniel: Department of Recreation, Park, and Tourism Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Meyer Michelle: Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2023, vol. 20, issue 3, 239-269

Abstract: Populations are increasingly exposed to natural hazards due to expanding development and climate change. This exposure is exacerbated by sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors limiting resources for disaster mitigation and recovery. Federal disaster assistance is crucial for communities in the wake of catastrophic events by supplementing local resources. However, recent research suggests that federal disaster assistance may exacerbate existing inequality across social groups. The most pervasive and costliest disaster in the United States is flooding. The federal government maintains multiple programs supporting flood mitigation and recovery, yet a comprehensive understanding of how these programs may foster inequitable outcomes is lacking. This paper uses a systematic review of federal flood policy literature over the last decade to fill this gap and identify patterns that may contribute to inequitable outcomes. Results suggest that despite over 100 flood-related disasters occurring over the past decade, the effectiveness of flood policies across social groups is relatively unstudied. And when studied, federal policies themselves do not explicitly lead to inequitable outcomes. Instead, we conclude that policies prioritize equality over equity and do not overcome systematic oppressive and racist decision-making. These findings further the understanding that social vulnerability to natural hazards is a complex and contextual issue.

Keywords: flood; federal disaster assistance; hazard mitigation; disaster recovery; social equity; social vulnerability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2021-0059 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:239-269:n:1002

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jhsem/html

DOI: 10.1515/jhsem-2021-0059

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management is currently edited by Irmak Renda-Tanali

More articles in Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().