The Need for a Policy Framework to Develop Disaster Resilient Regions

Hardenbrook Brandon J.
Additional contact information
Hardenbrook Brandon J.: Seattle University

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2005, vol. 2, issue 3, 25

Abstract: The United States will increasingly face threats and remain vulnerable to acts of terrorism and other disasters despite the many physical protection measures currently in place. While physical protection can limit or discourage attacks, the unfortunate reality is that nothing is ever 100% effective. In an interdependent age, spending money solely on physical protection will not solve the vulnerability problem (Scaling & Morrison, 2003, Scalingi 2004, Brown, 2004).A new approach must be taken not only to physically protect critical infrastructure but to prevent and deter attacks. This more comprehensive approach must include vulnerability assessments, risk-based mitigation, response and recovery after a disaster, training at all levels, more exercises and research and development (Mussington, 2002, Scalingi, 2003, 2004, Mencer, 2003, Brown, 2004). This broadened approach should help limit the overall impact of a disaster as well as deter potential attackers.A comprehensive approach to emergency management, specifically critical infrastructure security, cannot be accomplished if the private sector is excluded from these efforts. Because 85% of the nation's infrastructure is controlled by the private sector, the government's new programs and policies must be fashioned to encourage their participation.The federal government must recognize that critical infrastructure security planning must be conducted on a regional level. Incentives and guidelines to help move this planning process forward may be needed to ensure that the right players are involved. Moreover, the successes of other regional collaborations must be reviewed to determine whether these examples could be appropriated to address homeland security issues. Until this happens, the nation will continue down the path where individual agencies and jurisdictions prepare and respond to disasters on their own terms.

Keywords: Critical Infrastructure; Interdependencies; Homeland Security; Emergency Management; Policy; Disaster; Terrorism; Public Private Partnerships (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1133 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:2:y:2005:i:3:p:25:n:1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jhsem/html

DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1133

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management is currently edited by Irmak Renda-Tanali

More articles in Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().