An outline of quasi-probability*: Why quasi-Monte-Carlo methods are statistically valid and how their errors can be estimated statistically

Halton John H.

Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, 2004, vol. 10, issue 3-4, 183-196

Abstract: The classical model of probability theory, due principally to Kolmogorov, defines probability as a totally-one measure on a sigma-algebra of subsets (events) of a given set (the sample space), and random variables as real-valued functions on the sample space, such that the inverse images of all Borel sets are events. From this model, all the results of probability theory are derived. However, the assertion that any given concrete situation is subject to probability theory is a scientific hypothesis verifiable only experimentally, by appropriate sampling, and never totally certain. Furthermore classical probability theory allows for the possibility of “outliers”—sampled values which are misleading. In particular, Kolmogorov's Strong Law of Large Numbers asserts that, if, as is usually the case, a random variable has a finite expectation (its integral over the sample space), then the average value of N independently sampled values of this function converges to the expectation with probability 1 as N tends to infinity. This implies that there may be sample sequences (belonging to a set of total probability 0) for which this convergence does not occur.It is proposed to derive a large and important part of the classical probabilistic results, on the simple basis that the sample sequences are so constructed that the corresponding average values do converge to the mathematical expectation as N tends to infinity, for all Riemann-integrable random variables. A number of important results have already been proved, and further investigations are proceeding with much promise. By this device, the stochastic nature of some concrete situations is no longer a likely scientific hypothesis, but a proven mathematical fact, and the problem of outliers is eliminated. This model may be referred-to as “quasi-probability theory”; it is particularly appropriate for the large class of computations that are referred-to as “quasi-Monte-Carlo”.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/mcma.2004.10.3-4.183 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:10:y:2004:i:3-4:p:183-196:n:1001

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/mcma/html

DOI: 10.1515/mcma.2004.10.3-4.183

Access Statistics for this article

Monte Carlo Methods and Applications is currently edited by Karl K. Sabelfeld

More articles in Monte Carlo Methods and Applications from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().