In South Africa, “Rhodes Must Fall” (while Rhodes’ Walls Rise)
Bond Patrick ()
Additional contact information
Bond Patrick: University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg-Braamfontein2050, South Africa
New Global Studies, 2019, vol. 13, issue 3, 335-350
Abstract:
The African borders established in Berlin in 1884–85, at the peak of Cecil John Rhodes’ South African ambitions, were functional to the main five colonial-imperial powers, but certainly not to African societies then, nor to future generations. The residues of Rhodes’ settler-colonial racism and extractive-oriented looting include major cities such as Johannesburg, which are witnessing worse inequality and desperation, even a quarter of a century after apartheid fell in 1994. In South Africa’s financial capital, Johannesburg, a combination of post-apartheid neoliberalism and regional subimperial hegemony amplified xenophobic tendencies to the boiling point in 2019. Not only could University of Cape Town students tear down the hated campus statue of Rhodes, but the vestiges of his ethnic divide-and-conquer power could be swept aside. Rhodes did “fall,” in March 2015, but the South African working class and opportunistic politicians took no notice of the symbolic act, and instead began to raise Rhodes’ border walls ever higher, through ever more violent xenophobic outbreaks. Ending the populist predilection towards xenophobia will require more fundamental changes to the inherited political economy, so that the deep structural reasons for xenophobia are ripped out as convincingly as were the studs holding down Rhodes’ Cape Town statue.
Keywords: refugees; Cecil John Rhodes; South Africa; subimperialism; xenophobia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2019-0036 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:13:y:2019:i:3:p:335-350:n:6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ngs/html
DOI: 10.1515/ngs-2019-0036
Access Statistics for this article
New Global Studies is currently edited by Nayan Chanda, Akira Iriye and Saskia Sassen
More articles in New Global Studies from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().