US Foundations in Brazil and the Funding of the Human Rights Field – Data and Trends from 2003 to 2012

Nogueira Fernando do Amaral (), Alves Mario Aquino () and Emerenciano de Mendonça Patricia Maria ()
Additional contact information
Nogueira Fernando do Amaral: FGV-EAESP – GEP, R. Itapeva, 474, 7. andar, São Paulo, São Paulo 01332–000, Brazil
Alves Mario Aquino: FGV-EAESP – GEP, R. Itapeva, 474, 7. andar, São Paulo, São Paulo 01332–000, Brazil
Emerenciano de Mendonça Patricia Maria: EACH/USP, R. Arlindo Béttio, 1000, prédio I1, sala 302B, São Paulo, São Paulo 03828-000, Brazil

Nonprofit Policy Forum, 2015, vol. 6, issue 3, 371-393

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to describe and analyze the presence of US philanthropy in Brazil with regards to the field of human rights from 2003 to 2012, using data from the Foundation Center on 1896 grants totaling $336M. Human rights NGOs are especially important in Brazil. Despite recent growth and development, it is a country that still faces many social, political and human rights challenges. But the local field is still largely dependent on international funding, and US foundations play a traditional and vital role in this scenario, thus it is important to understand recent changes on American foundations priorities. The numbers indicate that the US investment in Brazil is concentrated in few areas (environment and human rights account for 50% of the amount invested), and these priorities are clearly different from those in the Brazilian philanthropic agenda (more focused on education, income generation, youth and community development). When we focus on human rights, we must underline that the investment in human rights by American foundations is quite notable. Not only is Brazil the country in which there were more investments in this topic in the last 10 years, but human rights is also the second field of priority in the country, right after Environment. When examining the collected data, there are four large patterns emerging: dependence on big donors, relevance of the strategy of “many small grants”, incipient grants in advocacy and possible existence of thematic niches. Of all these issues, the main challenge is that the field is very dependent on a few very large donors: Ford Foundation, Kellogg Foundation and the Global Fund for Women account for over 65% of the grants and 89% of the amount in US dollars. The Kellogg Foundation has already left Brazil to concentrate on other geographic priorities; should the Ford Foundation take a similar decision, the field of human rights in Brazil might even collapse, since Brazilian donors do not yet demonstrate enthusiasm for the subject.

Keywords: international philanthropy; human rights; Brazilian Civil Society; American philanthropy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2015-0005 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:6:y:2015:i:3:p:371-393:n:3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/npf/html

DOI: 10.1515/npf-2015-0005

Access Statistics for this article

Nonprofit Policy Forum is currently edited by Dennis Young

More articles in Nonprofit Policy Forum from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().