Using Network Analysis to Identify Key Actors in Collaborative Governance Processes

Carboni Julia L. (), Siddiki Saba (), Koski Chris () and Sadiq Abdul-Akeem ()
Additional contact information
Carboni Julia L.: Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York13244-1100, USA
Siddiki Saba: Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York13244-1100, USA
Koski Chris: Department of Political Science and Environmental Studies, Reed College, Portland97202-8199, USA
Sadiq Abdul-Akeem: School of Public Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando32816-2200, Florida, USA

Nonprofit Policy Forum, 2017, vol. 8, issue 2, 133-145

Abstract: Collaborative governance is an increasingly popular form of governance. In theory, collaborative governance processes should be inclusive and value the perspectives of multiple stakeholders, including nonprofit organizations. In practice, this may not be the case. Recent work on representation in collaborative governance has found asymmetry in the way actor groups are descriptively and substantively represented in the collaborative governance process. We extend this line of work by employing network methods to create a diagnostic tool to identify which individual actors are substantively represented in collaborative governance processes over time. This tool is designed to systematically evaluate whether individual actors are under or overrepresented in collaborative governance. It provides a starting point for groups to discuss whether they are functionally inclusive and to understand whether non-inclusion is random or systematic. We apply the tool to collaborative governance in a regional food system and find variance in substantive representation by actor, indicating the collaborative governance process diverges from its inclusive design in practice. In particular, nonprofit organizations who are formally part of the collaborative governance process are not substantively represented in formal meetings to the same degree as city and county agencies.

Keywords: collaborative governance; stakeholder representation; substantive representation; diagnostic tool; affiliation networks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2017-0012 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:133-145:n:6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/npf/html

DOI: 10.1515/npf-2017-0012

Access Statistics for this article

Nonprofit Policy Forum is currently edited by Dennis Young

More articles in Nonprofit Policy Forum from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().