Exploring the Relationship between State Charitable Solicitation Regulations and Fundraising Performance
Dietz Nathan (),
Barber Putnam (),
Lott Cindy () and
Shelly Mary ()
Additional contact information
Dietz Nathan: Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA
Barber Putnam: University of Washington Seattle (ret.), Seattle, WA, USA
Lott Cindy: Director, Nonprofit Management Programs, School of Professional Studies, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Shelly Mary: Uniform Law Commission, Chicago, IL, USA
Nonprofit Policy Forum, 2017, vol. 8, issue 2, 183-204
Abstract:
In the USA, the regulatory framework for fundraising by charitable organizations has been described as a “50-state mix of fees, registration, auditing, and financial reporting requirements” (Irvin 2005, “State Regulation of Nonprofit Organizations: Accountability Regardless of Outcome.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 34 (2):161–178). However, little is known about how differences in state fundraising regulations might affect the ability of organizations to raise funds from donors. State charities regulation is intended to cultivate an environment that incentivizes giving and reduces fraud, where donor dollars are maximized for the mission to which they are given. Whether current charitable solicitation regulations actually succeed or impede this regulatory goal is the subject of this paper. For this research, we create an index of fundraising regulatory breadth, based on the presence or absence of key components of state charitable solicitation regulations. We use a nationally representative, longitudinal database to examine the impact of state fundraising regulations on fundraising performance. The database, which contains details of over 110 million gift transactions recorded by charities between 2006 and 2016, permits the creation of several organization-level metrics used by professional fundraisers. These metrics serve as dependent variables in multivariate models, where the control variables characterize the charitable environment of the states where the organizations are located. Although space does not permit a complete description of our results, we suggest that further research will add to the understanding of how to construct effective regulation of these and other transactions. The analysis compares state-level measures of fundraising performance, which summarize the organization-level metrics calculated from the multivariate analysis, with the state-level values of the regulatory breadth index. The results of the analysis suggest that organizations tend to have lower values for these fundraising metrics, controlling for the characteristics of the state’s charitable environment, in states that have more robust regulatory regimes (where more activities are covered). However, these results appear to be largely a result of the influence of those states where both (1) regulatory breadth is greater and (2) the oversight system is bifurcated: that is, oversight of fundraising is located in both the state attorney general’s office and another state agency, such as a secretary of state’s office.
Keywords: charitable solicitations; state charities regulation; charities regulations; fundraising metrics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2017-0009 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:183-204:n:5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/npf/html
DOI: 10.1515/npf-2017-0009
Access Statistics for this article
Nonprofit Policy Forum is currently edited by Dennis Young
More articles in Nonprofit Policy Forum from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().