Brain Gain: Wohin gehen die Wissensträger in Zukunft?

Thomas Straubhaar

ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 1999, vol. 50, issue 1, 233-258

Abstract: The positive impact of human capital on economic growth has become an almost iron law of economics. The basic argument is that economies with more human capital grow faster and allow people to reach a higher per capita income. The transfer of this theoretically well developed argument into politics leads to a strong influence of public action in the human capital accumulation process. Most of the theoretically identified growth factors lose their empirical power if tougher econometric tests are applied. The direct link between human capital and growth does not really survive hard robustness tests. The assumption gains ground that the impact of human capital on growth is rather indirect and goes over longer life expectancy (due to a better knowledge of every day risks) over improved physical shape of children (due to the food provided by schools) and over the lowered fertility rate (due to the increase of economic power of women). The picture becomes definitely blurred once the international mobility of human capital is taken into account. The (international) mobility of human capital splits off the place of production of human capital and the place where human capital provides a value added. People work in the internet, do electronic commerce, consume in a third place and invest globally, and - probably most important - choose their place of living according to soft factors of local attractiveness (like security in the neighbourhood, clean water and air). A hard (worldwide) competition for the brightest brains emerges. Consequently, good human capital politics means attractiveness of locations. Immobile factors are forced to attract mobile high qualified people, to offer them complementary services and to produce together a high value added. Obviously, for such a brain gain strategy, an attractive local supply of complementary (public) goods is more important than direct (public) subsidies of human capitel accumulation processes.

Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-1999-0117 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:50:y:1999:i:1:p:233-258:n:17

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ordo/html

DOI: 10.1515/ordo-1999-0117

Access Statistics for this article

ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft is currently edited by Christian Müller

More articles in ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().