Müssen Utopien sozialistisch sein?
Habermann Gerd
ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 2004, vol. 55, issue 1, 99-126
Abstract:
After differentiating between unrealisable and fundamentally realisable, only at present not really Utopias, the author asks whether, following the collapse of the socialist models - the cause of which he briefly analyses, Utopian thinking has on the whole been exhausted. He denies this by demonstrating the great line of liberal models of Utopian order, which focus on freedom, property and the family, starting with Aristotle. Here too there are wide-spanning models, including and in particular, in the present. Several are outlined including, among others, the minarchistic models of Hayek or Friedman, Hoppes “natural order”, or Kohrs subsidiarity Utopia of the small state. The hour of such models should now have arrived, even if their radical variants continue to remain utopian for the time being. Utopias do not have to be socialist! We need idealistic models of order for personal orientation and in order to judge politics.
Date: 2004
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2004-0108 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:55:y:2004:i:1:p:99-126:n:8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ordo/html
DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2004-0108
Access Statistics for this article
ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft is currently edited by Christian Müller
More articles in ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().