Klimaschutz auf Kosten der Armen? Vorschläge für eine markt- und sozialverträgliche Umsetzung von CO2-Steuern und des Emissionshandels

Wolf Stephan () and Goldschmidt Nils ()
Additional contact information
Wolf Stephan: Professur für Kontextuale Ökonomik und ökonomische Bildung Universität SiegenSiegenGermany
Goldschmidt Nils: Lehrstuhl für kontextuale Ökonomik und ökonomische Bildung, Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Wirt-schaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsrecht, Universität SiegenSiegenGermany

ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 2019, vol. 70, issue 1, 125-165

Abstract: In this paper, we suggest a two-step approach to German climate policy. As a first step to be implemented in 2020, Germany should introduce a CO2 tax on fossil fuels which are consumed for private mobility and heating purposes. These emissions are currently not included in the EU-ETS cap. Similar to the Swiss carbon tax system, we suggest returning the revenue to the population. Unlike in Switzerland, though, direct refunds should concentrate on the poorest third of the German households and comprise only half of the tax yield. The other half should be spent on improving public transportation in rural areas and on subsidies for energy efficiency measures in apartment buildings. In accordance with the principles of a Social Market Economy, these measures would reconcile climate protection – as requested by intergenerational justice – and social justice: Individual contributions to climate protection depend on financial means. From 2030 on, Germany should start implementing a Personal Carbon Trading System to replace the tax solution – step two of our proposal. The tax solution creates the time slot needed for preparing the technically and legally more demanding consumer-based emissions trading system. Often it is claimed that such a consumer-based scheme is not feasible due to transaction and administration costs. Given the late progress in information technologies, we think most of these problems can be solved by now. Therefore, we think the implementation of a Personal Carbon Trading System is feasible, and it would provide the following advantages over a tax: the emission target is surely met, it is compatible with the existing EU-ETS, and each consumer directly realizes what emissions he or she is responsible for.

Keywords: CO2 Tax; Cap & Trade; Personal Carbon Trading System; EU-ETS; Redistribution; Poverty; Intergenerational Justice; CO2-Steuer; Emissionshandel; Personal Carbon Trading System; EU-ETS; Umverteilung; Armut; Generationengerechtigkeit; CO2 Tax; Cap & Trade; Personal Carbon Trading System; EU-ETS; Redistribution; Poverty; Intergenerational Justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D31 H31 Q48 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2020-0008 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:70:y:2019:i:1:p:125-165:n:7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ordo/html

DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2020-0008

Access Statistics for this article

ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft is currently edited by Christian Müller

More articles in ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().