Advocatus, et non Latro? Testing the Excess of Litigation in the Italian Courts of Justice
Paolo Buonanno and
Matteo Galizzi
Review of Law & Economics, 2014, vol. 10, issue 3, 285-322
Abstract:
We explore the causality relationship between litigation rates and the number of lawyers, drawing on an original panel dataset for the 169 Italian first-instance courts of justice between 2000 and 2007. In this time period, both the number of lawyers and the civil litigation rate sharply increased, and a mandatory minimum fee was in place for lawyers’ services. We first document that the number of lawyers is positively correlated with different measures of the litigation rate. Then, using an instrumental variables strategy, we find that a 10% increase in lawyers over population is associated with an increase between 1.6 and 6% in civil litigation rates. Our empirical analysis supports the supplier-induced demand (SID) hypothesis for Italian lawyers: following a sharp increase in the number of lawyers, and in the impossibility of competing on price because of the minimum fee regulation, some lawyers may have opportunistically used their informational advantage to induce their clients to bring lawsuits into court more often than would have been optimal if they were acting in the exclusive interest of their clients.
Keywords: lawyers; litigation rates; credence goods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H41 J44 K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2014-0022 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
Working Paper: Advocatus, et non latro?: testing the excess of litigation in the Italian courts of justice (2014) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:10:y:2014:i:3:p:38:n:3
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/rle/html
DOI: 10.1515/rle-2014-0022
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Law & Economics is currently edited by Francesco Parisi
More articles in Review of Law & Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().