How Accurately Can Convertibles be Classified as Debt or Equity for Tax Purposes? Evidence from Australia

Jean-Pierre Fenech (), Fang Victor () and Brown Rob
Additional contact information
Fang Victor: School of Accounting Economics and Finance, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
Brown Rob: Department of Finance, Melbourne University, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia

Review of Law & Economics, 2016, vol. 12, issue 1, 153-164

Abstract: The New Business Tax System (Debt and Equity) Act established a set of criteria by which convertible securities could be classified as “debt-like” or “equity-like” for tax purposes. Using data on 256 convertible issues made in Australia between 2001 and 2012, we show that there is a strong relation between, on the one hand, a convertible’s ex ante classification determined at issuance using the tax criteria and, on the other hand, its ex post classification based on the conversion premium at maturity. We conclude that the criteria have been an efficient means of classifying convertibles. We also find an industry effect where debt-like convertibles are more likely to be associated with the resources, metals and mining firms, whilst equity-like are mainly issued by the finance sector. This finding is consistent with the solution to a finance-sequencing problem in the former case, and the impact of capital adequacy regulation in the latter.

Keywords: tax classification; convertible securities; misclassification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2014-0028 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:12:y:2016:i:1:p:153-164:n:6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/rle/html

DOI: 10.1515/rle-2014-0028

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Law & Economics is currently edited by Francesco Parisi

More articles in Review of Law & Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().