Ex ante versus Ex post Governance: A Behavioral Perspective
Hoeppner Sven () and
Kirchner Christian ()
Additional contact information
Hoeppner Sven: Ghent University Law School, Ghent, Belgium
Kirchner Christian: Humboldt University Berlin Law School, Berlin, Germany Humboldt University Berlin School of Business and Economics, Berlin, Germany Wittenberg Center for Global Ethics, Berlin, Germany
Review of Law & Economics, 2016, vol. 12, issue 2, 227-259
Abstract:
Problems resulting from the delegation of competencies from one actor to another are at the heart of any governance discussion. While the conventional agency view strongly emphasizes that such problems can be solved ex post by monitoring and control strategies, the contract view proposes to tackle said problems ex ante through alignment of the agent’s incentives to those of the principal by, for instance, incentive contracts. In this paper, we introduce a behavioral perspective to this discussion. We will spotlight that the ex post strategies are behaviorally dysfunctional. The effect of self-serving and hindsight tendencies can hardly be overcome. Ex ante strategies, in contrast, suffer from problems of incentive design. However, proper incentive design can account for behavioral decision patterns. On this ground we argue that incentive contracting appears to be superior to monitoring approaches to solve the principal–agent conflict. To address behavioral problems in governance systems, we propose a counterintuitive shift of rule-making competencies: from public to private ordering for monitoring strategies and from private to public ordering for incentive contracting.
Keywords: corporate governance; agency problem; monitoring; incentive contracts; behavioral economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D01 D03 G34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2015-0003 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:12:y:2016:i:2:p:227-259:n:4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/rle/html
DOI: 10.1515/rle-2015-0003
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Law & Economics is currently edited by Francesco Parisi
More articles in Review of Law & Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().