Penalizing Shirking in Discovering Unsuitability
Xue Ying () and
Jiang Xu ()
Additional contact information
Xue Ying: Assistant Professor of Finance, Rohrer College of Business, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA
Jiang Xu: Associate Professor of Business Administration, 33853 Fuqua School of Business, Duke University , Durham, NC 27705, USA
Review of Law & Economics, 2024, vol. 20, issue 2, 267-288
Abstract:
We study the optimal penalty scheme for an expert firm and a layman client against shirking in their costly interaction that helps the firm discover the unsuitable transaction, i.e. one that yields a loss for the client. The market solution to the bilateral hidden action problem fails to incentivize sufficient effort and leads to an inefficient outcome, which creates scope for government action. By contrast, private contracts obtain efficiency in an alternative framework with just the firm’s unilateral effort, highlighting the role of the client’s effort in rationalizing legal intervention. Under the unique first-best policy, the firm not only refunds the client but also pays the client’s loss to the government if the firm fails to stop a transaction that ends up being unsuitable. The client receives the refund but submits the firm’s production cost to the government. The optimal punitive penalty is their total contingent loss and is robust to private contracts. The optimal penalty generalizes to a multi-agent team by making each agent internalize all others’ contingent losses.
Keywords: penalty; bilateral hidden action; unsuitability; information (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D11 D18 D6 K20 L51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2023-0004 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:20:y:2024:i:2:p:267-288:n:1001
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/rle/html
DOI: 10.1515/rle-2023-0004
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Law & Economics is currently edited by Francesco Parisi
More articles in Review of Law & Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().