EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Do Sanctions or Moral Costs Prevent the Formation of Cartel Agreements?

Boulu-Reshef Béatrice () and Monnier-Schlumberger Constance ()
Additional contact information
Boulu-Reshef Béatrice: Université d'Orléans, LEO, rue de Blois - BP 26739, 45067 Orléans, Cedex 2, France
Monnier-Schlumberger Constance: 197177 Universite Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne Ecole de Management de la Sorbonne , Paris, France

Review of Law & Economics, 2025, vol. 21, issue 2, 283-321

Abstract: Cartel decisions are made by managers. These decisions result in an increase in company earnings at the expense of the earnings of a third party, typically consumers or business partners. Using laboratory experiments, this article studies the behavioral foundations of individuals’ willingness to engage in a cartel, in a context in which engaging in such agreements increases the cartelists’ earnings, but reduces the earnings of a third participant. This reduction in earnings is a loss for the third participant but it can also be seen as a moral cost for the cartelists. In addition, the impact of different sanctions schemes–monetary, leniency, compliance, and exclusion–is investigated. The results show that forced compliance and exclusion sanction schemes are more effective deterrents than monetary and leniency sanction schemes. These results are robust to varying levels of moral costs and of probabilities of detection and fines. Although the impact of moral costs is statistically significant, it is limited in magnitude, showing that participants are more sensitive to the monetary gains associated with cartel agreements than to the reduction in earnings imposed on the third participant. Finally, being a woman and being risk-averse is associated with a lower propensity to engage in such agreements.

Keywords: antitrust; cartel; fraud; moral behavior; sanctions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 K21 K42 L41 M12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2024-0061 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:21:y:2025:i:2:p:283-321:n:1009

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyte ... journal/key/rle/html

DOI: 10.1515/rle-2024-0061

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Law & Economics is currently edited by Francesco Parisi

More articles in Review of Law & Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-23
Handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:21:y:2025:i:2:p:283-321:n:1009