Theory Meets Practice: Barriers to Entry in Merger Analysis
Coate Malcolm B.
Additional contact information
Coate Malcolm B.: Federal Trade Commission
Review of Law & Economics, 2008, vol. 4, issue 1, 183-212
Abstract:
Barriers to entry are a necessary, but not sufficient condition for a merger to adversely affect competition. As a barrier definition must be linked to the specific theory of competitive concern under review to be meaningful, a theoretical barrier definition is unlikely to be useful. Instead, an operational definition of barriers to entry is required. This paper explores the operationalization of the Merger Guidelines barrier to entry concept. A review of the files observes that most matters involve multiple entry scenarios, so it is often impossible to draw strict conclusions for the individual characteristics of timeliness, likelihood or sufficiency. However, by following each entry scenario through the three-stage analysis, it is possible to identify barriers to entry in 109 of the 138 matters reviewed. Within this analysis, the timeliness consideration is generally supported by the best evidence, while the likelihood characteristic leaves the most room for improvement. A total of 55 matters exhibit evidence of recent entry and 46 files report expectations of future entry. A few files detail innovative net present value analyses to determine the profitability of entry into the market. This type of financial analysis offers the promise of a quantitative approach to likelihood analysis.
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1240 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:4:y:2008:i:1:n:10
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/rle/html
DOI: 10.2202/1555-5879.1240
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Law & Economics is currently edited by Francesco Parisi
More articles in Review of Law & Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().