Jury Verdicts in Drunken Driving Cases
Smith Stan V.,
Zaloshnja Eduard,
Miller Ted,
David Smith () and
Spicer Rebecca S.
Additional contact information
Smith Stan V.: Smith Economics Group, Ltd.
Zaloshnja Eduard: Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
Miller Ted: Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
Spicer Rebecca S.: Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
Review of Law & Economics, 2008, vol. 4, issue 1, 475-498
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to examine the factors used by juries to make their decisions on compensatory damages awarded for physical injuries in automobile crash cases involving driving under the influence of alcohol and to compute a value that juries might award for hypothetical total impairment. This study used data obtained from Jury Verdict Research on drunk driving, non-fatal injury cases occurring in the time period from 1980 through 1990, before tort reform started in several states. To achieve the objective of this study, we used two log-linear regression models, with the logs of award and net award amounts as dependent variables. The award variable is a comprehensive figure that includes punitive damages and medical expenses. To calculate the net award, the latter were subtracted from the award amount. The regression explained 57% of the variance in 323 injury awards for impaired driving.The present value of impairment was the dominant predictor. Alone, it explained 21% of the variance. The type of verdict was also very important. Awards achieved through jury trials were approximately 75 percent higher than those achieved through mediation, arbitration or settlement. Using the model where the log of net award was the dependent variable, the value juries placed on total impairment compared to no impairment was approximately $3.1 million at 4% discount rate and $4.3 million at 2.5% discount rate (in 2005 dollars).
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1271 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:4:y:2008:i:1:n:22
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rle
DOI: 10.2202/1555-5879.1271
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Law & Economics is currently edited by Francesco Parisi
More articles in Review of Law & Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().