The Court's Divide
Lehman Dale E. ()
Additional contact information
Lehman Dale E.: Alaska Pacific University
Review of Network Economics, 2002, vol. 1, issue 2, 13
Abstract:
The Supreme Court decision in Verizon et al v. FCC et al has finally settled the legality of the FCC's methodology for setting prices for wholesale services that are "based on cost", as required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Court's decision reveals unanimous agreement that forward-looking costs may be used as the measure of cost. It also reveals agreement that the FCC's leeway in establishing a methodology for measuring these costs is limited by the need for the methodology to bear a "rational connection" to the goals of the Act. The majority and Justice Breyer differ in whether this limitation was binding in this case. This paper examines the theoretical and empirical evidence that could have shed light on the Court's disagreement - evidence that was not part of the case presented to the Court. While the evidence casts considerable doubt on the wisdom of the public policy approach adopted by the FCC, it does not lead to the conclusion that the Court should have ruled differently.
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1446-9022.1008 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:rneart:v:1:y:2002:i:2:n:3
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyte ... journal/key/rne/html
DOI: 10.2202/1446-9022.1008
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Network Economics is currently edited by Lukasz Grzybowski
More articles in Review of Network Economics from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().