The Great Powers Competition and Increasing Entropy in the Local Media Across Africa and Asia
Gooch Elizabeth (),
Kim Steven,
Sobrepena Nicholas,
Goethe Stone and
Eckstrand Eric
Additional contact information
Gooch Elizabeth: US Federal Economist, Washington, DC, USA
Kim Steven: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA, USA
Sobrepena Nicholas: US Federal Statistician, Washington, DC, USA
Goethe Stone: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA
Eckstrand Eric: Department of Operations Research, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA
Statistics, Politics and Policy, 2024, vol. 15, issue 3, 309-350
Abstract:
The current United States National Defense Strategy prioritizes strategic competition with Russia and China, whereas for the previous two decades, the priority was counter-terrorism. This research aims to measure the extent to which competition among great powers is intensifying and identify where such intensification is taking place. To achieve this, we utilize a large, open-source dataset called GDELT 2.0, which provides an archive of global news articles. We calculate the entropy for local press coverage of great powers (e.g., the United States, China, Russia, France, and India) across 96 African and Asian nations to measure static competition levels. Additionally, we identify African and Asian nations where competition levels have changed significantly between 2015 and 2020. Our findings show that seven countries are experiencing increased competition among great powers, whereas seven other countries experience increased domination by one great power. When we aggregate the data geographically, we find that Southeast Asia is the only subregion where there is a significant decrease in competition. Our results align with the primary concern of the National Defense Strategy: that American influence is decreasing. Specifically, we have identified increased competition across Africa and increased domination across Asia. These trends are due to a relatively higher reporting of Chinese in-country public and private entities between 2015 and 2020.
Keywords: global politics; national security; influence; China; Russia; United States (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2023-0048 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:15:y:2024:i:3:p:309-350:n:1001
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/spp/html
DOI: 10.1515/spp-2023-0048
Access Statistics for this article
Statistics, Politics and Policy is currently edited by Joel A. Middleton
More articles in Statistics, Politics and Policy from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().