Understanding the 2016 US Presidential Polls: The Importance of Hidden Trump Supporters
Enns Peter K. (),
Lagodny Julius and
Schuldt Jonathon P.
Additional contact information
Enns Peter K.: Department of Government, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA
Lagodny Julius: Department of Government, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA
Schuldt Jonathon P.: Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA
Statistics, Politics and Policy, 2017, vol. 8, issue 1, 41-63
Abstract:
Following Donald Trump’s unexpected victory in the 2016 US presidential election, the American Association for Public Opinion Research announced that “the polls clearly got it wrong” and noted that talk of a “crisis in polling” was already emerging. Although the national polls ended up being accurate, surveys just weeks before the election substantially over-stated Clinton’s lead and state polls showed systematic bias in favor of Clinton. Different explanations have been offered for these results, including non-response bias and late deciders. We argue, however, that these explanations cannot fully account for Trump’s underperformance in October surveys. Utilizing data from two national polls that we conducted in October of 2016 (n>2100 total) as well as 14 state-level polls from October, we find consistent evidence for the existence of “hidden” Trump supporters who were included in the surveys but did not openly express their intention to vote for Trump. Most notably, when we account for these hidden Trump supporters in our October survey data, both national and state-level analyses foreshadow Trump’s Election Day support. These results suggest that late-breaking campaign events may have had less influence than previously thought and the findings hold important implications for how scholars, media, and campaigns analyze future election surveys.
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2017-0003 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:8:y:2017:i:1:p:41-63:n:5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/spp/html
DOI: 10.1515/spp-2017-0003
Access Statistics for this article
Statistics, Politics and Policy is currently edited by Joel A. Middleton
More articles in Statistics, Politics and Policy from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().