EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

On dependence consistency of CoVaRand some other systemic risk measures

Mainik Georg () and Schaanning Eric ()
Additional contact information
Mainik Georg: RiskLab, Department of Mathematics, ETH Zurich, Raemistrasse 101, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Schaanning Eric: Mathematical Finance Section, Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, 180 Queen's Gate, SW7 2AZ, London, United Kingdom

Statistics & Risk Modeling, 2014, vol. 31, issue 1, 49-77

Abstract: This paper is dedicated to the consistency of systemic risk measures with respect to stochastic dependence. It compares two alternative notions of Conditional Value-at-Risk (CoVaR) available in the current literature. These notions are both based on the conditional distribution of a random variable Y given a stress event for a random variable X, but they use different types of stress events. We derive representations of these alternative CoVaR notions in terms of copulas, study their general dependence consistency and compare their performance in several stochastic models. Our central finding is that conditioning on X ≥ VaRα(X) gives a much better response to dependence between X and Y than conditioning on X = VaRα(X). We prove general results that relate the dependence consistency of CoVaR using conditioning on X ≥ VaRα(X) to well established results on concordance ordering of multivariate distributions or their copulas. These results also apply to some other systemic risk measures, such as the Marginal Expected Shortfall (MES) and the Systemic Impact Index (SII). We provide counterexamples showing that CoVaR based on the stress event X = VaRα(X) is not dependence consistent. In particular, if (X, Y) is bivariate normal, then CoVaR based on X = VaRα(X) is not an increasing function of the correlation parameter. Similar issues arise in the bivariate t model and in the model with t margins and a Gumbel copula. In all these cases, CoVaR based on X ≥ VaRα(X) is an increasing function of the dependence parameter.

Keywords: Systemic risk measures; conditional Value-at-Risk (CoVaR); Risk spillover; dependence consistency; stochastik ordering; Systemic risk measures; conditional Value-at-Risk (CoVaR); Risk spillover; dependence consistency; stochastik ordering (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/strm-2013-1164 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:strimo:v:31:y:2014:i:1:p:29:n:4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/strm/html

DOI: 10.1515/strm-2013-1164

Access Statistics for this article

Statistics & Risk Modeling is currently edited by Robert Stelzer

More articles in Statistics & Risk Modeling from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bpj:strimo:v:31:y:2014:i:1:p:29:n:4