Analyzing model robustness via a distortion of the stochastic root: A Dirichlet prior approach

Mai Jan-Frederik (), Schenk Steffen () and Scherer Matthias ()
Additional contact information
Mai Jan-Frederik: XAIA Investment GmbH, Sonnenstr. 19, 80331 München, Germany
Schenk Steffen: Lehrstuhl für Finanzmathematik, Technische Universität München, Parkring 11, 85748 Garching-Hochbrück, Germany
Scherer Matthias: Lehrstuhl für Finanzmathematik, Technische Universität München, Parkring 11, 85748 Garching-Hochbrück, Germany

Statistics & Risk Modeling, 2015, vol. 32, issue 3-4, 177-195

Abstract: It is standard in quantitative risk management to model a random vector 𝐗:={Xtk}k=1,...,d${\mathbf {X}:=\lbrace X_{t_k}\rbrace _{k=1,\ldots ,d}}$ of consecutive log-returns to ultimately analyze the probability law of the accumulated return Xt1+⋯+Xtd${X_{t_1}+\cdots +X_{t_d}}$. By the Markov regression representation (see [25]), any stochastic model for 𝐗${\mathbf {X}}$ can be represented as Xtk=fk(Xt1,...,Xtk-1,Uk)${X_{t_k}=f_k(X_{t_1},\ldots ,X_{t_{k-1}},U_k)}$, k=1,...,d${k=1,\ldots ,d}$, yielding a decomposition into a vector 𝐔:={Uk}k=1,...,d${\mathbf {U}:=\lbrace U_{k}\rbrace _{k=1,\ldots ,d}}$ of i.i.d. random variables accounting for the randomness in the model, and a function f:={fk}k=1,...,d${f:=\lbrace f_k\rbrace _{k=1,\ldots ,d}}$ representing the economic reasoning behind. For most models, f is known explicitly and Uk may be interpreted as an exogenous risk factor affecting the return Xtk in time step k. While existing literature addresses model uncertainty by manipulating the function f, we introduce a new philosophy by distorting the source of randomness 𝐔${\mathbf {U}}$ and interpret this as an analysis of the model's robustness. We impose consistency conditions for a reasonable distortion and present a suitable probability law and a stochastic representation for 𝐔${\mathbf {U}}$ based on a Dirichlet prior. The resulting framework has one parameter c∈[0,∞]${c\in [0,\infty ]}$ tuning the severity of the imposed distortion. The universal nature of the methodology is illustrated by means of a case study comparing the effect of the distortion to different models for 𝐗${\mathbf {X}}$. As a mathematical byproduct, the consistency conditions of the suggested distortion function reveal interesting insights into the dependence structure between samples from a Dirichlet prior.

Keywords: Model robustness; model uncertainty; Value-at-Risk models; Dirichlet copula (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/strm-2015-0009 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:strimo:v:32:y:2015:i:3-4:p:177-195:n:2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/strm/html

DOI: 10.1515/strm-2015-0009

Access Statistics for this article

Statistics & Risk Modeling is currently edited by Robert Stelzer

More articles in Statistics & Risk Modeling from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().