SREP capital ratios and due process
Schuster Gunnar and
Pitz Sebastian
Additional contact information
Schuster Gunnar: Dr. iur., partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Frankfurt/M.
Pitz Sebastian: Associate lawyer at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Frankfurt/M.
Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft (ZBB) / Journal of Banking Law and Banking (JBB), 2016, vol. 28, issue 5, 342-353
Abstract:
The introduction of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) and the resulting transfer of prudential bank supervisory competences to the European Central Bank (ECB) has led to material changes in the European financial supervisory landscape. One of the ECB’s key supervisory tools is the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP). On the basis of the outcome of this process, the ECB requires significant credit institutions to hold additional own funds. This article describes and analyses the ECB’s handling of this significant regulatory tool and identifies weaknesses in applicable due process requirements.
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.15375/zbb-2016-0506 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:zfbrbw:v:28:y:2016:i:5:p:342-353:n:6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/zbb/html
DOI: 10.15375/zbb-2016-0506
Access Statistics for this article
Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft (ZBB) / Journal of Banking Law and Banking (JBB) is currently edited by Johannes Köndgen
More articles in Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft (ZBB) / Journal of Banking Law and Banking (JBB) from RWS Verlag
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().