PROGRESSIVITY VERSUS A FLAT TAX RATE IN COMBATING SOCIAL INEQUALITY?

Alina Ailincă ()

Contemporary Economy Journal, 2019, vol. 4, issue 3, 39-46

Abstract: On the automatic stabilization capabilities of the progressive tax regimes much has been written and argued. Equally, the flat tax rate has often been indicated as a promoter and stimulator of business, but also as a factor for the perpetuation and widening of social inequalities. Therefore, the article reproduces some of the themes of previous articles trying to discern between the qualities and defects of the two types of taxation regimes: progressive or single quota. The empirical analysis on the data gathered for the EU28 countries following the two tax regimes is interesting and surprising and deserves further reflection. This analysis supports the results shown in the literature on progressive tax regimes, but equally points to a number of key tax elements that use the flat tax rate, investigating whether or not it acts as a regressive tax by its effect on the Gini coefficient.

Keywords: automatic stabilization; EU28; social inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E63 H11 H24 I38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.revec.ro/papers/190305.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:brc:brccej:v:4:y:2019:i:3:p:39-46

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Contemporary Economy Journal from Constantin Brancoveanu University
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cristina GANESCU ().