SECTION III EUROPEAN LAW AND PUBLIC POLICIES THE PRINCIPLE NON REIORMATIO IN PEJUS IN ROMANIAN LEGISLATION

Gradinaru Nicolae
Additional contact information
Gradinaru Nicolae: PhD, Associate Professor, Universitatea "Constantin Brancoveanu" Pitesti

Management Strategies Journal, 2020, vol. 50, issue 4, 90-93

Abstract: The principle non reformatio in peius (non-reformation for the worse, ie no one can worsen the situation through their own appeal) must be respected both when judging the appeal and at the retrial of the case, following the annulment or quashing of the decision, because retrial is the consequence exercise of the appeal, and the party must have the certainty that it will not worsen its situation, not only in the appeal it has promoted, but also in the procedural stages subsequent to the admission of this appeal. The principle non reformatio in pejus is regulated in this way, according to art.481 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the appellant cannot be created in his own appeal a worse situation than the one from the contested decision, unless he expressly consents to this or in the specific cases provided by law

Keywords: appeal; appeal; recourse; express; res judicata authority (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K0 K1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.strategiimanageriale.ro/papers/200413.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:brc:journl:v:50:y:2020:i:4:p:90-93

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Strategies Journal from Constantin Brancoveanu University
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dan MICUDA ().