EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Volatility Estimation and Forecasting During Crisis Periods: A Study Comparing GARCH Models with Semiparametric Additive Models

Douglas Gomes dos Santos () and Flávio Augusto Ziegelmann ()
Additional contact information
Douglas Gomes dos Santos: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
Flávio Augusto Ziegelmann: UFRGS

Brazilian Review of Finance, 2012, vol. 10, issue 1, 49-70

Abstract: In this paper, we compare semiparametric additive models with GARCH models in terms of their capability to estimate and forecast volatility during crisis periods. Our Monte Carlo studies indicate a better performance for GARCH models when their functional forms do not differ from that of the specified Data Generating Process (DGP). However, if they differ from the DGP, the results suggest the superiority of additive models. Additionally, we perform an empirical application in three selected periods of high volatility of IBOVESPA returns series, in which both families of models obtain similar results.

Keywords: volatility; semiparametric additive models; GARCH models; crisis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C14 C22 C52 C53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rbfin/article/download/3321/2451 (application/pdf)
http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rbfin/article/view/3321 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:brf:journl:v:10:y:2012:i:1:p:49-70

Access Statistics for this article

Brazilian Review of Finance is currently edited by Marcio Laurini

More articles in Brazilian Review of Finance from Brazilian Society of Finance
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marcio Laurini ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:brf:journl:v:10:y:2012:i:1:p:49-70