Economics of Poker: The Effect of Systematic Change
Matthew Rutherford and
Additional contact information
Roger Hannum: University of Denver
Matthew Rutherford: University of Denver
Teresa Dalton: University of Denver
Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 2012, vol. 6, issue 1, 25-48
Survey data on participation in gambling typically contain many zeros. The presence of many zeros presents methodological problems for the analysis of participation in gambling markets and gambling expenditure. The most common techniques for handling zeros in gambling data have been the Tobit estimator and the Heckman selectivity estimator. Recent research indicates that hurdle models (Jones 1989, 2000) and the Cragg (1971) model, are better suited to analyze participation in gambling. We apply these models to gambling participation in Canada and find that the double hurdle model is preferred in two of the three forms of gambling examined.
JEL-codes: L83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:buc:jgbeco:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:25-48
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Gambling Business and Economics is currently edited by Leighton Vaughan Williams, Nottingham Business School
More articles in Journal of Gambling Business and Economics from University of Buckingham Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dominic Cortis, University of Malta ().