Perspectives on interpersonal utility comparisons: an analysis of selected models

Afschin Gandjour ()
Additional contact information
Afschin Gandjour: Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

The Journal of Philosophical Economics, 2024, vol. 1, issue 1, 1-17

Abstract: : Recently, new models for comparing the strength of individual preferences have been proposed. This perspective article discusses these models within the context of different accounts of how people attribute mental states to others. The paper highlights that the new models share a common shortcoming with Harsanyi’s Equiprobability Model of Moral Value Judgments, which is the inability to facilitate interpersonal comparisons of preference strengths.

Keywords: interpersonal utility comparison; mental states; empathy; sympathy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A12 B40 Z13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://jpe.episciences.org/12767/pdf (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.46298/jpe.11271 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bus:jphile:v:17:y:2024:i:1:n:1

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Philosophical Economics is currently edited by Valentin Cojanu

More articles in The Journal of Philosophical Economics from Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Valentin Cojanu ().