Comparison of the phenolic content and total antioxidant activity in wines as determined by spectrophotometric methods

Pavel Stratil, Vlastimil Kubáň and Jitka Fojtová
Additional contact information
Pavel Stratil: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
Vlastimil Kubáň: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
Jitka Fojtová: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 2008, vol. 26, issue 4, 242-253

Abstract: Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (FCM) and Price and Butler method (PBM) were used for spectrophotometric determination of the total content of phenolic compounds in 29 wines (8 white, 21 red). The average contents of phenolic compounds determined by FCM and PBM were 108 (90-119) and 105 (90-129) for white wines, and 1545 (874-2262) and 547 (306-816) mg/l of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) for red wines, respectively. The reason for the lower PBM values in red wines is the higher reactivity in PBM of phenolic compounds, especially of gallic acid generally used as a standard in the above methods. The higher reactivity of the standard means that the measured absorbance of the sample responds to a lower concentration. The average total antioxidant activities determined by TEAC (Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity), FRAP (Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power), and DPPH (using diphenyl-p-picrylhydrazyl radical) were 5.14 (4.30-6.14), 1.43 (0.86-2.14), and 0.71 (0.61-0.81) of Trolox equivalents (TE) and 26.44 (13. 9-34.4), 9.43 (4.92-13.9), and 5.52 (2.91-8.62) mmol/l TE for white and red wines, respectively. Almost the same molar absorptivities with TEAC and DPPH methods were found while with FRAP method it was somewhat higher (about 1.56-times). The ratio of the values determined by FRAP and DPPH methods for white and red wines were 2.0 and 1.7, respectively. The TEAC values were 2.8- and 4.8-fold higher than those determined by FRAP and DPPH methods, respectively. The radical ABTS*+ used in TEAC method is therefore the most reactive and responds to the highest number of hydroxyl groups of the phenolic compounds of wines.

Keywords: wine; phenolic compounds; total antioxidant activity; FCM; PBM; TEAC; DPPH; FR (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/1119-CJFS.html (text/html)
http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/1119-CJFS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:26:y:2008:i:4:id:1119-cjfs

DOI: 10.17221/1119-CJFS

Access Statistics for this article

Czech Journal of Food Sciences is currently edited by Ing. Zdeňka Náglová Ph.D.

More articles in Czech Journal of Food Sciences from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().