EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Antibiotic resistance of enterococci, coagulase negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from chicken meat

Naci Erhan Yurdakul, Zerrin Erginkaya and Emel Ünal
Additional contact information
Naci Erhan Yurdakul: Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey
Zerrin Erginkaya: Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey
Emel Ünal: Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey

Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 2013, vol. 31, issue 1, 14-19

Abstract: We determined the antibiotic resistance of enterococci, coagulase negative staphylococci, and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from chicken meat samples. The antibiotic resistance of the isolated strains was estimated by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method (according to the NCCLS document M2-A9 suggestions). It was found that all strains of Enterococcus spp. were resistant to tetracycline, 75% of them were resistant to ciprofloxacin, and 50% of them were resistant to erythromycin, vancomycin, and chloramphenicol. Also all strains of S. aureus were resistant to tetracycline and 25% of S. aureus strains were resistant to erythromycin and chloramphenicol, whereas all strains of S. aureus were sensitive to teicoplanin and 25% of them were sensitive to vancomycin and ciprofloxacin. As for the isolate of coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS), 68.1% of them were resistant to erythromycin, 77.2% of them were resistant to tetracycline, 59% of them were resistant to vancomycin, 9% of them were resistant to teicoplanin, and 27.2% of them were resistant to both chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin. As a result, it was found that most of the strains (all of S. aureus and Enterococcus spp., also 77.2% CNS) were resistant to tetracycline.

Keywords: Staphylococcus spp.; Enterococcus spp.; susceptibility test; identification; antibiotic (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/58/2012-CJFS.html (text/html)
http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/58/2012-CJFS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:31:y:2013:i:1:id:58-2012-cjfs

DOI: 10.17221/58/2012-CJFS

Access Statistics for this article

Czech Journal of Food Sciences is currently edited by Ing. Zdeňka Náglová Ph.D.

More articles in Czech Journal of Food Sciences from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-31
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:31:y:2013:i:1:id:58-2012-cjfs