Combined beef thawing using response surface methodology
Jiahui Jin,
Xiaodan Wang,
Yunxiu Han,
Yaoxuan Cai,
Yingming Cai,
Hongmei Wang,
Lingtao Zhu,
Liping Xu,
Lei Zhao and
Zhiyuan Li
Additional contact information
Jiahui Jin: College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
Xiaodan Wang: College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
Yunxiu Han: College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
Yaoxuan Cai: College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
Yingming Cai: College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
Hongmei Wang: College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
Lingtao Zhu: College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
Liping Xu: College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
Lei Zhao: College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
Zhiyuan Li: College of Food Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, P.R. China
Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 2016, vol. 34, issue 6, 547-553
Abstract:
Based on four thawing methods (still air, still water, ultrasonic wave, and microwave) and single-factor tests, we established a four-factor three-level response surface methodology for a regression model (four factors: pH, drip loss rate, cooking loss rate, protein content). The optimal combined thawing method for beef rib-eye is: microwave thawing (35 s work/10 s stop, totally 170 s) until beef surfaces soften, then air thawing at 15°C until the beef centre temperature reaches -8°C, and finally ultrasonic thawing at 220 W until the beef centre temperature rises to 0°C. With this method, the drip loss rate is 1.9003%, cooking loss rate is 33.3997%, and protein content is 229.603 μg, which are not significantly different from the model-predicted theoretical results (P ≥ 0.05).
Keywords: microwave; Box-Behnken; thaw; ultrasound (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/138/2016-CJFS.html (text/html)
http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/138/2016-CJFS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:34:y:2016:i:6:id:138-2016-cjfs
DOI: 10.17221/138/2016-CJFS
Access Statistics for this article
Czech Journal of Food Sciences is currently edited by Ing. Zdeňka Náglová, Ph.D.
More articles in Czech Journal of Food Sciences from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().