EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Questions and avenues for lucerne improvement

Paolo Annicchiarico, Carla Scotti, Maria Carelli and Luciano Pecetti
Additional contact information
Paolo Annicchiarico: CRA - Centro di Ricerca per le Produzioni Foraggere e Lattiero-Casearie, Lodi, Italy
Carla Scotti: CRA - Centro di Ricerca per le Produzioni Foraggere e Lattiero-Casearie, Lodi, Italy
Maria Carelli: CRA - Centro di Ricerca per le Produzioni Foraggere e Lattiero-Casearie, Lodi, Italy
Luciano Pecetti: CRA - Centro di Ricerca per le Produzioni Foraggere e Lattiero-Casearie, Lodi, Italy

Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 2010, vol. 46, issue 1, 1-13

Abstract: Six crucial questions for lucerne breeders are set up and discussed in relation to the available information. (i) Which width of adaptation? Genotype נlocation interaction is region-specific and may be wide enough to justify breeding for specific adaptation. Genotype נexploitation interaction requires contrasting plant types for mowing and intensive grazing. (ii) Can we breed very drought-tolerant varieties? One drought-tolerant landrace exhibited a drought-avoidance, water-conservation strategy based on limited root development, while large root featured material adapted to favourable environments and/or frequent mowing. (iii) Which selection scheme and variety type? Many schemes were proposed for synthetic varieties, but empirical or theoretical comparisons were limited in number and inference space. Non-additive genetic variation may be exploited by free hybrids (semi-hybrids) through procedures varying in complexity, possibly assisted by marker evaluation. Previous selection of exotic germplasm for adaptation is essential. (iv) How to improve the forage quality? Selection for modified stem morphology (increased internode number, decreased internode length) proved effective. Combined selection for forage yield and leaf/stem ratio seems also feasible. (v) Which opportunities for marker-assisted selection? Linkage maps for lucerne are available but useful markers for forage yield may be site-specific. Bulk segregant analysis is promising in breeding for stress tolerance. (vi) How to exploit genomic information from M. truncatula? This model species can help in developing markers and locating genes which control metabolic pathways, such as saponin content and composition. Information from M. truncatula on marker-trait association for forage yield or tolerance to abiotic stresses may be little exploitable.

Keywords: drought tolerance; forage quality; genomics; grazing tolerance; heterosis; markers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/90/2009-CJGPB.html (text/html)
http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/90/2009-CJGPB.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:46:y:2010:i:1:id:90-2009-cjgpb

DOI: 10.17221/90/2009-CJGPB

Access Statistics for this article

Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding is currently edited by Ing. Markéta Knížková, (Executive Editor)

More articles in Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:46:y:2010:i:1:id:90-2009-cjgpb