EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

High percentage of morphological defects in sperm of the Zemplin rabbit breed: A major obstacle to fertility?

Jakub Vozaf, Andrea Svoradová, Jaromír Vašíček, Lucia Olexiková, Andrej Baláži, Hana Ďuránová, Alexander Ostró, Silvia Toporcerová and Peter Chrenek
Additional contact information
Jakub Vozaf: Institute of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Slovak Republic
Andrea Svoradová: Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Reproduction, NPPC, Research Institute for Animal Production, Nitra - Lužianky, Slovak Republic
Jaromír Vašíček: Institute of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Slovak Republic
Lucia Olexiková: Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Reproduction, NPPC, Research Institute for Animal Production, Nitra - Lužianky, Slovak Republic
Andrej Baláži: Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Reproduction, NPPC, Research Institute for Animal Production, Nitra - Lužianky, Slovak Republic
Hana Ďuránová: AgroBioTech Research Centre, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovak Republic
Alexander Ostró: Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovak Republic
Silvia Toporcerová: Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice, Slovak Republic
Peter Chrenek: Institute of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Slovak Republic

Czech Journal of Animal Science, 2024, vol. 69, issue 5, 191-199

Abstract: This research investigates the high prevalence of morphological defects in the sperm of a particular rabbit breed, namely the Zemplin rabbit (ZR). We tried to uncover the possible causes and consequences of the observed abnormalities. Ejaculate samples from ten adult males were divided into two qualitative groups according to the motility parameters revealed by CASA (computer-assisted sperm analysis). Group A contained samples with total motility (TM) above 50% and progressive motility (PM) above 30%. Group B contained samples with TM and PM below these values. Viability (SYBR-14/DRAQ5TM and SYTOXTM Green/DRAQ5TM staining) and apoptosis (YO-PRO TM-1/DRAQ5 TM stainig) analyses through flow cytometry served as an additional insight into the characteristics of the qualitative groups. In both cases, we noted significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups which corresponded to motility values. Both groups showed an increased incidence of abnormal spermatozoa, and we did not observe any significant differences between them. Simultaneously, we assessed the practical implications of these sperm defects on artificial insemination (AI), and also, we did not notice any significant differences in these parameters. The use of transmission electron microscopy enhanced our understanding of the morphological defects at the ultrastructural level. In summary, the study provides an understanding of the qualitative differences in rabbit semen, highlighting variations in quality parameters. While these differences exist, they may not necessarily translate into significant variations in AI outcomes. Our study shows higher values of cytoplasmic droplets in ZR semen, but it also shows that these conditions do not necessarily mean a fundamental obstacle to fertility in the case of AI.

Keywords: biodiversity; conservation; cytoplasmic droplet; morphology; spermatozoa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/29/2024-CJAS.html (text/html)
http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/29/2024-CJAS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:69:y:2024:i:5:id:29-2024-cjas

DOI: 10.17221/29/2024-CJAS

Access Statistics for this article

Czech Journal of Animal Science is currently edited by Bc. Michaela Polcarová

More articles in Czech Journal of Animal Science from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:69:y:2024:i:5:id:29-2024-cjas