EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Early tree growth, productivity, fruit quality and leaf nutrients content of sweet cherry grown in a high density planting system

T. Milošević, N. Milošević, I. Glišić, R. Nikolić and J. Milivojević
Additional contact information
T. Milošević: Department of Fruit Growing and Viticulture, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Kragujevac, Cacak, Serbia
N. Milošević: Department of Pomology and Fruit Breeding, Fruit Research Institute in Cacak, Cacak, Serbia
I. Glišić: Department of Fruit Growing and Viticulture, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Kragujevac, Cacak, Serbia
R. Nikolić: Department of Fruit Growing and Viticulture, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Kragujevac, Cacak, Serbia
J. Milivojević: Center for Small Grains, Kragujevac, Serbia

Horticultural Science, 2015, vol. 42, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: From 2008 to 2013 the phenology, early tree growth, precocity, yield, fruit quality attributes and leaf nutrient status of four sweet cherry cultivars (May Early, Germersdorfer, Sunburst and Celeste) were evaluated on Colt rootstock in the Cacak region (Serbia) with 1,250 trees/ha. The soil type was heavy and acidic. The results showed that cv. May Early blossomed and ripened earlier than the other cultivars, and had the highest tree vigour, better yield performance and the poorest fruit physico-chemical attributes. The best fruit quality was found in cv. Sunburst which is categorized as a low precocious cultivar with small yield capacity. Lower tree vigour, good productivity and fruit quality were shown by cv. Celeste. In general, leaf analysis indicated that all cultivars had excessive levels of N and Cu, and in some cases P, whereas K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn and B were deficient in all cultivars. The best balanced nutritional values (ΣDOP) were observed in cv. Sunburst, whereas wider imbalance was observed in cv. Celeste for macronutrients. In contrast, the ΣDOP for micronutrients indicated that cv. Celeste had the best balanced nutritional values, whereas cv. Sunburst had the worst.

Keywords: fruit size; Prunus avium L.; macro- and micronutrients; soluble solids; yield (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hortsci.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/119/2014-HORTSCI.html (text/html)
http://hortsci.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/119/2014-HORTSCI.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:42:y:2015:i:1:id:119-2014-hortsci

DOI: 10.17221/119/2014-HORTSCI

Access Statistics for this article

Horticultural Science is currently edited by Ing. Eva Karská (Executive Editor)

More articles in Horticultural Science from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:42:y:2015:i:1:id:119-2014-hortsci