EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Morphological variation of male A. arguta plants affects their flowering potential and pollen efficiency

Agnieszka Stasiak, Barbara Łata, Monika Bieniasz and Piotr Latocha
Additional contact information
Agnieszka Stasiak: Department of Environmental Protection,
Barbara Łata: Laboratory of Basic Sciences in Horticulture, Faculty of Horticulture, Biotechnology, and Landscape Architecture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
Monika Bieniasz: Department of Pomology and Apiculture, University of Agriculture in Cracow, Cracow, Poland
Piotr Latocha: Department of Environmental Protection,

Horticultural Science, 2020, vol. 47, issue 2, 100-109

Abstract: Actinidia arguta (Siebold et Zucc.) Planch. ex Miq. is functionally a cryptic dioecious plant and successful pollination is crucial for achieving high quality fruit. The extent and bases of morphological variability in female genotypes have been well studied, but here we focus on the males. Mature plants of seven male A. arguta genotypes were studied in 2016 and 2017 during which a suite of phenological and morphological features was measured on ten randomly chosen one-year-old canes on each plant. This analysis was complemented by two other, specialized measures potentially related to pollination efficiency, namely pollen quality, and quantity. The time of bud break was similar each year across all genotypes and the pollen quality was uniformly very high (viability - 95.0-99.9% and germination - 89.0-97.3%). However, the ten genotypes exhibited high variability in both the number of flowers per inflorescence and pollen quantity, indicating marked differences in their flowering potential and efficiency as pollinizers. The male kiwiberry indicators developed in this study - flowering potential and pollen efficiency, appear to be effective tools for the comparative evaluation of male A. arguta genotypes.

Keywords: kiwiberry; pollination; hardy kiwifruit; male genotype indicators; pollen quantity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hortsci.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/37/2019-HORTSCI.html (text/html)
http://hortsci.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/37/2019-HORTSCI.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:47:y:2020:i:2:id:37-2019-hortsci

DOI: 10.17221/37/2019-HORTSCI

Access Statistics for this article

Horticultural Science is currently edited by Ing. Eva Karská (Executive Editor)

More articles in Horticultural Science from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:47:y:2020:i:2:id:37-2019-hortsci