How much birch (Betula papyrifera) is too much for maximizing spruce (Picea glauca) growth: a case study in boreal spruce plantation forests

Ch.D.B. Hawkins, A. Dhar and B.J. Rogers
Additional contact information
Ch.D.B. Hawkins: Mixedwood Ecology and Management Program, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
A. Dhar: Mixedwood Ecology and Management Program, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
B.J. Rogers: Mixedwood Ecology and Management Program, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada

Journal of Forest Science, 2012, vol. 58, issue 7, 314-327

Abstract: Interest in conifer-broadleaf mixedwood forests has greatly increased due to continuous demand for hardwood products and a shift towards more biological or ecosystem-based management. In British Columbia, more than 30% of the productive forest land is a conifer-broadleaf mixture and current forest regulations are more conifer biased rather than maintaining a mixed-species condition. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of paper birch on white spruce growth. Spruce growth data from 10 to 18 years old complex stands indicate that radial, height, and stem volume was not impacted by retaining up to 3,000 stems.ha-1 of birch. Similarly, growth and yield model projections suggest spruce-birch stands would be more productive up to a threshold birch density (3,000 stems.ha-1) than pure spruce stands. At a 4% real interest rate, the removal of birch from these stands does not appear to be warranted as an investment. The results suggest that instead of encouraging uniform broadleaf removal across conifer plantations, mixed species management strategies could enhance the forest productivity, stand diversity and resilience.

Keywords: competition; future value; growth and yield model; forest management; productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/8/2012-JFS.html (text/html)
http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/8/2012-JFS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:58:y:2012:i:7:id:8-2012-jfs

DOI: 10.17221/8/2012-JFS

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Forest Science is currently edited by Mgr. Ilona Procházková

More articles in Journal of Forest Science from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().