EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of animal logging in the mixed broadleaved mountain forest: Economic and environmental impacts

Aysan Badraghi, Jörn Erler, Seyed Ata Ollah Hosseini and Robert Lang
Additional contact information
Aysan Badraghi: Department of Forest Technology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Technical University Dresden, Tharandt, Germany
Jörn Erler: Department of Forest Technology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Technical University Dresden, Tharandt, Germany
Seyed Ata Ollah Hosseini: Department of Forestry and Forest Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Robert Lang: Department of Forest Technology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Technical University Dresden, Tharandt, Germany

Journal of Forest Science, 2018, vol. 64, issue 6, 251-259

Abstract: This investigation assessed the economic and environmental impacts of small-scale wood logging by mules in the mixed broadleaved mountain forest. To develop a time prediction model, all measurements of time are replaced by their decadic logarithms. Unit cost was calculated by two methods: (i) as usual, division of the system cost by average productivity per hour, (ii) on the basis of the developed logarithmic models. To investigate the residual damage a 100% inventory method was employed in pre- and post-hauling, alongside the mule trail. A core sampling technique of bulk density was used for determining the degree of soil compaction, and soil disturbed widths were measured at a 5-m interval in the mule hauling direction. In this research, computed unit cost was 17.2 EUR.m-3 and estimated unit cost by the logarithmic model was 16.2 EUR.m-3. This result highlights the time consumption which estimated by the developed model was at a close ratio with real time (average at 95%). In terms of environmental impact, the results indicated that 5.7% of regenerations and 0% of trees were damaged. Also we found that the increased bulk density was not significant (P = 0.903) and only about 0.2% of the total area was disturbed.

Keywords: productivity and cost; logarithm; mule; residual damage; soil damage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/18/2018-JFS.html (text/html)
http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/18/2018-JFS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:64:y:2018:i:6:id:18-2018-jfs

DOI: 10.17221/18/2018-JFS

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Forest Science is currently edited by Mgr. Ilona Procházková

More articles in Journal of Forest Science from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:64:y:2018:i:6:id:18-2018-jfs