EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Woodland key habitat contribution to preserve biological diversity in Lithuania: assessing the difference between 2005 and 2017

Indré Ruškyté, Gediminas Brazaitis, Michael Manton and Žydrunas Preikša
Additional contact information
Gediminas Brazaitis: Institute of Forest Biology and Silviculture, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Ecology, Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy, Akademija, Lithuania
Michael Manton: Institute of Forest Biology and Silviculture, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Ecology, Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy, Akademija, Lithuania
Žydrunas Preikša: Institute of Forest Biology and Silviculture, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Ecology, Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy, Akademija, Lithuania

Journal of Forest Science, 2021, vol. 67, issue 9, 436-448

Abstract: In response to the degradation of forest ecosystems, their habitats and the loss of species, many formal conservation policies and voluntary forest conservation tools have been proposed and implemented. The woodland key habitat (WKH) is one such initiative that aims to protect biodiversity. This generally involves two key actions: (i) the creation of policy (conservation action) and (ii) the consequences of the policy or initiative in the field. However, the final step of measuring their success in the field is often missing. The aim of this study is to assess the contribution of the WKH initiative to conserve biodiversity in Lithuania. We compared the changes in spatial distribution, species assemblages and richness within the WKH network between 2005 and 2017. Results showed that the spatial distribution of WKHs decreased in number and by area after 12 years. However, species occurrence, abundance and richness of the WHK network generally increased. In conclusion, we found the WKH initiative has contributed to the conservation of forest habitats and biodiversity in Lithuania. However, the future of the WKH network is uncertain due to the current voluntary system, lack of support and funding.

Keywords: boreal forests; threatened species; conservation; species richness; high conservation value forests (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/64/2021-JFS.html (text/html)
http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/64/2021-JFS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:67:y:2021:i:9:id:64-2021-jfs

DOI: 10.17221/64/2021-JFS

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Forest Science is currently edited by Mgr. Ilona Procházková

More articles in Journal of Forest Science from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:67:y:2021:i:9:id:64-2021-jfs