EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Serological and biochemical distinguishing of Pseudomonas syringae pathovars on peas

Iveta Pánková and Blanka Kokošková

Plant Protection Science, 1999, vol. 35, issue 3, 79-84

Abstract: Polyclonal antisera to detect and determine two related pathovars, Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi and Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, were prepared Untreated bacterial cells, or fixed by formaldehyde or glutaraldehyde were used as antigens. After cross-absorption with heterologous antigens, antisera revealed a high level of specificity in slide agglutination, Ouchterlony gel double-diffusion and in DAS-ELISA and PTA-ELISA. Each of 14 P s. pisi prepared polyclonal antisera could detect and deter­ mine all strains of P s. pisi, regardless of race. PTA-ELISA was the most appropriate serological test to distinguish Pseudomonas syringae pathovars on peas. Most of the P s. pisi strains from foreign collections were in serological tests confirmed asP. s. pisi, while most of the Czech strains suspected as P s. pisi were determined as P s. syringae strains. The principal biochemical reaction, i.e., use of DL-homoserine as a carbon source to grow P s. pisi but not P s. syringae , was proved not to be sufficiently reliable to distinguish both pathovars.

Keywords: bacterial blight of peas; Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi; Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae: slide agglutination; Ouchterlony gel double-diffusion; ELISA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/9703-PPS.html (text/html)
http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/9703-PPS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:35:y:1999:i:3:id:9703-pps

DOI: 10.17221/9703-PPS

Access Statistics for this article

Plant Protection Science is currently edited by Ing. Eva Karská, (Executive Editor PPS)

More articles in Plant Protection Science from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:35:y:1999:i:3:id:9703-pps