EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Ovicidal effects of thiacloprid, acetamiprid, lambda-cyhalothrin and alpha-cypermethrin on Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) eggs

Marek Seidenglanz, Jiří Rotrekl, Jana Poslušná and Pavel Kolařík
Additional contact information
Marek Seidenglanz: Services Ltd., Šumperk, Czech Republic
Jiří Rotrekl: Research Institute for Fodder Crops, Ltd., Troubsko, Czech Republic
Jana Poslušná: Services Ltd., Šumperk, Czech Republic
Pavel Kolařík: Research Institute for Fodder Crops, Ltd., Troubsko, Czech Republic

Plant Protection Science, 2011, vol. 47, issue 3, 109-114

Abstract: The effects of two pyrethroid (lambda-cyhalothrin, alpha-cypermethrin) and two neonicotinoid (acetamiprid, thiacloprid) insecticides on B. pisorum L. eggs were compared under field conditions in the Czech Republic in 2005-2007. The main objective of the study was to find out what real effects can be expected from the available insecticides registered in Europe when applied at the time of the first egg occurrence on lower pods. In general, the rates of Bruchus pisorum egg (+ first instar larvae) survival were significantly lower with all the insecticides compared in the study, in each of the three years (2005, 2006, 2007). The tested insecticides showed some ovicidal effects and also some larvicidal effects. The tested pyrethroids (lambda-cyhalothrin, alpha-cypermethrin) showed somewhat higher effectiveness in comparison with the neonicotinoids (acetamiprid, thiacloprid). Alpha-cypermethrin was the most effective in all three years. In 2006 and in 2007 this insecticide significantly reduced the rates of egg survival in comparison with acetamiprid. In contrast, acetamiprid was the least effective insecticide in each of the three years.

Keywords: Bruchus pisorum; pea weevil; pyrethroids; neonicotinoids; ovicidal effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/71/2010-PPS.html (text/html)
http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/71/2010-PPS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:47:y:2011:i:3:id:71-2010-pps

DOI: 10.17221/71/2010-PPS

Access Statistics for this article

Plant Protection Science is currently edited by Ing. Eva Karská, (Executive Editor PPS)

More articles in Plant Protection Science from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:47:y:2011:i:3:id:71-2010-pps