Antifungal potential and biochemical effects of monoterpenes and phenylpropenes on plant
Gehan I. Kh. Marei and
Samir. A. M. Abdelgaleil
Additional contact information
Gehan I. Kh. Marei: Department of Pest Control and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt
Plant Protection Science, 2018, vol. 54, issue 1, 9-16
Abstract:
To develop new natural fungicides, six monoterpenes and two phenylpropenes were tested for their antifungal activity against eight plant pathogenic fungi. The results of the mycelial growth inhibition assay showed that trans-cinnamaldehyde was the most potent compound against the eight tested fungi with EC50 values ranging between 0.75 and 3.19 mg/l. This compound caused the higher mycelial growth inhibition than carbendazim. Furthermore, (-)-menthone exhibited strong antifungal activity against Alternaria solani (EC50 = 9.31 mg/l), Penicillium digitatum (EC50 = 16.14 mg/l), and Rhizoctonia solani (EC50 = 24.69 mg/l). Likewise, eugenol showed potent antifungal activity against P. digitatum, R. solani, Fusarium solani, and A. solani, whereas EC50 values were less than 30.0 mg/l. In a separate experiment, trans-cinnamaldehyde, p-cymene, eugenol, and (-)-menthone were evaluated for their inhibitory effects on pectin methyl esterase and cellulase. The tested compounds exhibited the pronounced inhibition of enzyme activities with trans-cinnamaldehyde being the most potent inhibitor for both enzymes.
Keywords: natural products; antifungal activity; enzyme inhibition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/9/2017-PPS.html (text/html)
http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/9/2017-PPS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:54:y:2018:i:1:id:9-2017-pps
DOI: 10.17221/9/2017-PPS
Access Statistics for this article
Plant Protection Science is currently edited by Ing. Eva Karská, (Executive Editor PPS)
More articles in Plant Protection Science from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().