EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Antifungal activity of various chitinolytic bacteria against Colletotrichum in pepper

Muhammad Anees, Muhammad Abid, Shafiq ur Rehman, Nadeem Ahmed, Muhammad Ashraf, Lixin Zhang and Kil Yong Kim
Additional contact information
Muhammad Abid: Department of Plant Pathology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
Shafiq ur Rehman: Department of Botany, Kohat University of Science Technology, Kohat, Pakistan
Nadeem Ahmed: Department of Botany, Mohi-Ud-Din Islamic University, Nerian Sharif, Azad Jammu Kashmir
Muhammad Ashraf: Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
Lixin Zhang: College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, P.R. China
Kil Yong Kim: Institute of Environmentally Friendly Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, South Korea

Plant Protection Science, 2019, vol. 55, issue 2, 109-115

Abstract: Colletotrichum gleosporioides causes the anthracnose disease in plants including vegetables and fruits. The pathogenicity of the strains was confirmed by using pepper fruit inoculation assays. The chitinolytic bacterial strains Paenibacillus elgii HOA73, Lysobacter capsici HS124, Streptomyces griseus, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Paenibacillus ehimensis MA2012 were evaluated against the phytopathogenic fungal strains. The bacteria significantly inhibited C. gleosporioides strain 40003, the inhibition ranging from 17% to 37%. Similarly, 5-41% inhibition of C. gleosporioides 40896 was noticed. Moreover, C. gleosporioides 40965 and 42113 were also inhibited. The n-butanol extracted crude compound of P. ehimensis MA2012 completely inhibited the spore germination of the phytopathogen. Hence the chitinolysis may be considered as an important trait for screening the biocontrol bacteria against anthracnose.

Keywords: anthracnose; Colletotrichum gleosporioides; chitinolytic; biocontrol (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/72/2018-PPS.html (text/html)
http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/72/2018-PPS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:55:y:2019:i:2:id:72-2018-pps

DOI: 10.17221/72/2018-PPS

Access Statistics for this article

Plant Protection Science is currently edited by Ing. Eva Karská, (Executive Editor PPS)

More articles in Plant Protection Science from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:55:y:2019:i:2:id:72-2018-pps