EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The influence of the type of storage on pest infestation of stored grain in the Czech Republic

V. Stejskal, J. Hubert, Z. Kučerová, Z. Munzbergová, J. Lukáš and E. Žďárková
Additional contact information
V. Stejskal: Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic
J. Hubert: Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic
Z. Kučerová: Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic
Z. Munzbergová: Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic
J. Lukáš: Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic
E. Žďárková: Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic

Plant, Soil and Environment, 2003, vol. 49, issue 2, 55-62

Abstract: Stored-product pests cause high economic losses by feeding on stored grain and endanger the public health by contamination of food by allergens. Therefore, the aim of this work was to explore whether the risk of infestation of stored grain by pests is different in various types of storage premises. We compared the level of infestation and the pest species composition in the two main types of grain stores in Central Europethat includes horizontal flat-stores (HFS) and vertical silo-stores (elevators) (VSS). A total of 147 grain stores located in Bohemia, CzechRepublicwas inspected. We found that both types of stores were infested with arthropods of three main taxonomic groups: mites (25 species, 120 000 individuals), psocids (8 species, 5 600 individuals) and beetles (23 species, 4 500 individuals). We found that VSS and HFS differ in species composition of mites, psocids and beetles. However, the primary grain pests (i.e. Lepidoglyphus destructor, Acarus siro, Tyrophagus putrescentiae, Lachesilla pedicularia, Sitophilus oryzae, Rhyzopertha dominica, Oryzaephilus surinamensis and Cryptolestes ferrugineus) occurred in both types of stores. The only exception was higher frequency and abundance of two serious beetle-pests (Tribolium castaneum, Sitophilus granarius) in HFS than in VSS. The total numbers of mite and beetle species infesting VSS and HFS was almost the same. There was higher psocid species diversity in VSS than in HFS. The difference between the total (i.e. level of pest infestation per kg of grain sample) numbers of mite and psocid individuals collected from VSS and HFS was not significant. However, the total numbers of beetle-pest individuals collected from HFS was twice the amount collected from VSS. We concluded that both types of stores are equally risky in terms of mite and psocid infestation. HFS is more risky for grain storage than VSS in terms of beetle infestations, although even the VSS structures cannot be in no way called pest-safe. The VSS and HFS microclimatic conditions (humidity, temperature) are discussed in relation to mite, psocid and beetle infestation.

Keywords: food; grain; storage; silo; bulk stores; pests; mites; psocids; beetles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4090-PSE.html (text/html)
http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4090-PSE.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:49:y:2003:i:2:id:4090-pse

DOI: 10.17221/4090-PSE

Access Statistics for this article

Plant, Soil and Environment is currently edited by Kateřina Součková

More articles in Plant, Soil and Environment from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:49:y:2003:i:2:id:4090-pse