Earthworms are little affected by reduced soil tillage methods in vineyards

Florian Faber, Elisabeth Wachter and Johann G. Zaller
Additional contact information
Florian Faber: Education and Research Centre for Viticulture and Pomology Klosterneuburg, Klosterneuburg, Austria
Elisabeth Wachter: Education and Research Centre for Viticulture and Pomology Klosterneuburg, Klosterneuburg, Austria
Johann G. Zaller: Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU),

Plant, Soil and Environment, 2017, vol. 63, issue 6, 257-263

Abstract: Inter-rows in vineyards are commonly tilled in order to control weeds and/or to conserve water. While impacts of tillage on earthworms are well studied in arable systems, very little is known from vineyards. In an experimental vineyard, the impact of four reduced tillage methods on earthworms was examined: rotary hoeing, rotary harrowing, grubbing and no tillage. According to an erosion prevention programme, tillage was applied every other inter-row only while alternating rows retained vegetated. Earthworms were extracted from the treated inter-rows 10, 36, 162 and 188 days after tillage. Across dates, tillage methods had no effect on overall earthworm densities or biomass. Considering each sampling date separately, earthworm densities were affected only at day 36 after tillage leading to lower densities under rotary hoeing (150.7 ± 42.5 worms/m2) and no tillage (117.3 ± 24.8 worms/m2) than under rotary harrowing (340.0 ± 87.4 worms/m2) and grubbing (242.7 ± 43.9 worms/m2). Time since tillage significantly increased earthworm densities or biomass, and affected soil moisture and temperature. Across sampling dates, earthworm densities correlated positively with soil moisture and negatively with soil temperature; individual earthworm mass increased with increasing time since tillage. It was concluded that reduced tillage in vineyards has little impact on earthworms when applied in spring under dry soil conditions.

Keywords: agroecosystem; soil cultivation; soil disturbance; soil macrofauna; viticulture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/160/2017-PSE.html (text/html)
http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/160/2017-PSE.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:63:y:2017:i:6:id:160-2017-pse

DOI: 10.17221/160/2017-PSE

Access Statistics for this article

Plant, Soil and Environment is currently edited by Kateřina Součková

More articles in Plant, Soil and Environment from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().