Environmental implications of animal wastes pollution on agricultural soil and water quality
Christopher O. Akinbile,
Andrew E. Erazua,
Toju E. Babalola and
Fidelis O. Ajibade
Additional contact information
Christopher O. Akinbile: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria
Andrew E. Erazua: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria
Toju E. Babalola: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria
Fidelis O. Ajibade: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria
Soil and Water Research, 2016, vol. 11, issue 3, 172-180
Abstract:
An attempt was made to ascertain the environmental effects of animal wastes pollution on agricultural soil and water quality at the oldest teaching and research farm, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. Physical, chemical, and bacteriological analyses of water (shallow well) and soil samples were carried out to determine the present quality status. Fifteen soil samples collected at the centre of the animal wastes dump and at a distance of 5 and 10 m, and three different samplings done on the water source were analyzed. The parameters determined using APHA standard procedures included: turbidity, temperature, pH, alkalinity, sulphide, phosphate, dissolved oxygen, total dissolved solids, total hardness, biochemical oxygen demand, total iron, nitrate, chloride, calcium, and heavy metals like copper, zinc, and lead. Most of the parameters indicated pollution including heavy metals presence with the exception of Pb, Zn, Mn, Cu, and Cr that were not detected in water samples. Concentrations of nitrate, biochemical oxygen demand, SO42-, PO43-, and Cl- were 0.20, 3.20, 10.50, 3.5, and 20.4 mg/l respectively, while those of detected heavy metals such as Mg and Ni were 1.98 and 10.03 mg/l, respectively. Soil water holding capacity, porosity, pH, organic matter, organic carbon, and organic nitrogen ranged from 33.34 ± 3.73 to 59.06 ± 5.69, 34.6 ± 3.28 to 52.43 ± 5.5, 6.56 ± 0.03 to 7.54 ± 0.03, 2.32 ± 0.03 to 5.35 ± 0.03, 1.33 ± 0.01 to 3.11 ± 0.01, and 0.58 ± 0.07 to 1.13 ± 0.03%, respectively. The results showed that the well is strongly polluted with bacteria and pathogens and requires considerable treatment before use while the soil is suitable for crop production.
Keywords: animal; pollution; soil; water; wastes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/29/2015-SWR.html (text/html)
http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/29/2015-SWR.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:11:y:2016:i:3:id:29-2015-swr
DOI: 10.17221/29/2015-SWR
Access Statistics for this article
Soil and Water Research is currently edited by Ing. Markéta Knížková, (Executive Editor)
More articles in Soil and Water Research from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().