The proportion of soil aggregates in dependence on the fraction composition of humic substances

Erika Tobiašová, Gabriela Barančíková, Erika Gömöryová, Štefan Koco, Ján Halás, Božena Dębska and Magdalena Banach-Szott
Additional contact information
Erika Tobiašová: 5
Gabriela Barančíková: National Agriculture and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Prešov, Slovakia
Erika Gömöryová: Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia;$2
Štefan Koco: National Agriculture and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Prešov, Slovakia
Ján Halás: National Agriculture and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Prešov, Slovakia
Božena Dębska: University of Technology and Life Sciences, Bydgoszcz, Poland
Magdalena Banach-Szott: University of Technology and Life Sciences, Bydgoszcz, Poland

Soil and Water Research, 2018, vol. 13, issue 4, 193-199

Abstract: Humic substances (HS) are an important stabilizing element in the formation of soil aggregates. The experiment included 6 soil types (Haplic Fluvisol, Haplic Chernozem, Cutanic Luvisol, Haplic Cambisol, Haplic Planosol, Rendzic Leptosol), each in four types of ecosystems (forest, meadow, urban, and agro-ecosystems). Soil macroaggregates were separated with the sieve (dry and wet sieve) to size fractions of net aggregates; humic acids (HA) and fulvic acids (FA) were divided into 3(4) fractions: free and bound with mobile R2O3, bound with Ca2+, and bound with mineral components and stable R2O3. The influence of HA and FA fractions on the proportion of dry-sieved macroaggregates (DSA) and wet-sieved macroaggregates (WSA) was different. Mainly HA bound with polyvalent cations had a positive influence. In the case of HS, their influence depends also on the components with which HA and FA are bound. WSA of the 0.5-1 mm size fraction that is an important indicator of changes in ecosystems, had a higher proportion in the ecosystems influenced by man (agro-ecosystem > urban >) than in the ecosystems close to nature (> meadow > forest ecosystems). The influence of ecosystem was reflected in the proportion of those fractions of DSA and WSA on which the effect of soil type and HS was not shown, and vice versa.

Keywords: dry-sieved and water-resistant macroaggregates; ecosystem; fulvic acids; humic acids (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/207/2017-SWR.html (text/html)
http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/207/2017-SWR.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:13:y:2018:i:4:id:207-2017-swr

DOI: 10.17221/207/2017-SWR

Access Statistics for this article

Soil and Water Research is currently edited by Ing. Markéta Knížková, (Executive Editor)

More articles in Soil and Water Research from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().