Biens publics mondiaux et institutions internationales: quel avenir pour la Banque mondiale ?

Ravi Kanbur

Revue d’économie du développement, 2016, vol. 24, issue 3, 9-24

Abstract: The World Bank is in the doldrums, or worse. The global public goods (GPG) argument is often put forward as a way of reviving and even rescuing an institution whose financial base to support conventional sovereign loans is receding sharply relative to needs and competition from other sources. The World Bank does have certain advantages as an institution, which the global community could use to address GPG issues. It has technical excellence and convening power to help build consensus on a range of GPG issues, although this cannot be fully realized without radical reform of its governance structures. It has experience with managing concessional and grant resources, which will be central to financing GPG mechanisms. And it also has experience with country operations to implement the country specific dimensions of GPG mechanisms. That is what the World Bank is good for now, three quarters of a century after its founding.

Keywords: commons; global public goods; World Bank (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=EDD_303_0009 (application/pdf)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-du-developpement-2016-3-page-9.htm (text/html)
free

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cai:edddbu:edd_303_0009

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revue d’économie du développement from De Boeck Université Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire ().