13. Les expérimentations aléatoires, le « gold standard » des méthodes d’évaluation d’impact ?

Arthur Jatteau ()

Regards croisés sur l'économie, 2018, vol. n° 22, issue 1, 184-194

Abstract: By randomly sampling the recipients of the public policies they study, randomized controlled trials allow the effects of these policies to be assessed and are considered by many economists as a gold standard. However, they are subject to multiple limitations, which weaken their validity and call for a wider use of mixed empirical designs that include qualitative methods.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RCE_022_0184 (application/pdf)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-regards-croises-sur-l-economie-2018-1-page-184.htm (text/html)
free

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cai:rcedec:rce_022_0184

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Regards croisés sur l'économie from La Découverte
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire ().