Réponse à des critiques du jugement majoritaire

Michel Balinski

Revue économique, 2019, vol. 70, issue 4, 589-610

Abstract: The article by Laslier [2017] presents a strange description of the new method of voting called ?majority judgment,? of its properties, of its supposed paradoxes and antecedents. This response brings clarifications.

Keywords: majority judgment; range voting; approval voting; Condorcet consistency; no-show paradox; Arrow paradox; median voter; response to Laslier’s critics; domination paradox (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RECO_704_0589 (application/pdf)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-economique-2019-4-page-589.htm (text/html)
free

Related works:
Working Paper: Réponse à des Critiques du Jugement Majoritaire (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_704_0589

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revue économique from Presses de Sciences-Po
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire ().