Les fondements axiomatiques de la mesure des inégalités
Thibault Gajdos ()
Revue d'économie politique, 2001, vol. 111, issue 5, 683-719
Abstract:
It is hopeless to look for an objective measure of inequalities. Indeed, the measure of inequalities depends on citizen?s opinions about justice. It is hence necessary to explicit the ethical fundations of inequality indices. We try, in this note, to present and discuss thoroughly the consequences of the various opinions on which an inequality index may be built. We distinguish two classes of inequality indices. The first one is the class of Atkinson-Kolm-Sen indices, which respect the independence axiom, and implicitely rely on the von Neumann and Morgenstern model. The second one is the class of the Generalized Ginis, which do not respect the independence axiom, and implicitely rely on the Rank-Dependent Expected Utility model. The Ginis indices allow for a thiner representation of citizen?s attitude towards inequality. These indices seem hence of particular interest for evaluating redistributive policies and their adequacy to social objectives.
Keywords: inequality measurement; attitude towards inegalities; rank-dependent expected utility model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=REDP_115_0683 (application/pdf)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique-2001-5-page-683.htm (text/html)
free
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_115_0683
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Revue d'économie politique from Dalloz
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire ().